SHADOWSCOPE

AI DISCOVERY & GOVERNANCE
Northwind Logistics · 180 employees
Scan window: 8 Jun – 8 Jul 2026 · 4,238 events
Discovery complete

You are running 21 AI services. You approved nine.

Nobody deployed these. They arrived one browser tab at a time, and through vendor updates that switched AI features on inside tools you already had. 160 of your 180 employees sent data to at least one of them this month.

SCAN :: proxy telemetry → service fingerprinting 21 / 21 identified
21
AI services found running
inside the organization
12
operating outside
any governance
6
critical data exposures
nobody had noticed
160
employees sending data
to external AI

What the AI found that the scanner could not

Pattern matching narrowed 4,238 events to 107 worth reading. It cannot tell "help me phrase this budget variance" from "here are our unannounced Q3 numbers." Both are Finance, both are ChatGPT, both are text. Only meaning separates them. Every verdict below shows its evidence, its reasoning, and the one fact that would change its mind.

And what it threw away

99

findings dismissed as false positives. The scanner flags every agent platform on principle, because agents hold credentials to other systems. So it flagged daniel.kowalski → n8n alongside the real incidents. His prompt was "what causes dwell time to increase at a distribution center." That is a warehouse question, not a breach. An analyst who has to read 99 of those stops reading. That is how alert fatigue kills a program, and it is why the dismissals matter as much as the findings.